AWARD OUTCOME
What happened
Revenue Scotland published an award for a Business Justification Review under the Technology Assurance Framework for the SETS 3 Project. The published award value is £9,900 and names Quo Imus Limited (trading as Qi Consulting) as supplier; that supplier name remains unverified in the supplied identity-check data.
Published outcomeAward published to a single named supplier through a direct, non-competitive procedure. The linked contract record is marked active, but the supplied data does not state a signature date or contract start date.
Market significanceA small, specialist technology assurance review engagement, classified under system quality assurance assessment and review services.
AWARDED SUPPLIERS AND LOTS
1 supplier record analysed
Quo Imus Limited (trading as Qi Consulting)
90% confidenceAward awd-1 · 9900 GBP · Named supplier; identity unverified
View supporting evidence
Award "awd-1" names "Quo Imus Limited (trading as Qi Consulting)" as supplier and gives a value of GBP 9,900. Supplier identity status is "checked_unmatched".
LIFECYCLE
Award or contract stage
Notice stage
99% confidenceAward
View supporting evidence
Process stage is "award", display status is "awarded", and notice type is "award".
Contract record status
96% confidenceActive
View supporting evidence
Contract record id "awd-1" has status "active" and awardID "awd-1".
Signature status
99% confidenceUnknown
View supporting evidence
No signature or conclusion date is supplied.
VALUES
Published values explained
Published award value
99% confidence£9,900
View supporting evidence
Award "awd-1" value is amount 9900, currency GBP.
Value allocation
93% confidenceSingle award with one named supplier
View supporting evidence
The award lists one supplier, Quo Imus Limited (trading as Qi Consulting). No lots or separate value allocations are supplied.
TIMELINE
Procurement timeline
Award notice published
99% confidence9 October 2026, 10:39:35 UTC
View supporting evidence
Process published_at and release date are "2026-10-09T10:39:35Z".
Contract start
99% confidenceUnknown
View supporting evidence
contract_start_at is null.
Contract end
99% confidenceUnknown
View supporting evidence
contract_end_at is null.
SCOPE
What was awarded
Requirement
98% confidenceBusiness Justification Review under the Technology Assurance Framework for the SETS 3 Project
View supporting evidence
Process and award-item description state this requirement.
Category
99% confidenceServices
View supporting evidence
main_category and mainProcurementCategory are "services".
Classification
99% confidenceCPV 72225000 — System quality assurance assessment and review services
View supporting evidence
Published additional classification is CPV 72225000.
PROCEDURE
Procedure and competition
Procedure
99% confidenceDirect award
View supporting evidence
procurement_method is "direct".
Competition
99% confidenceSingle supplier without competition
View supporting evidence
Procurement method details state: "The contract is awarded to a single supplier without competition."
CONTRACT TERMS
Published contract terms
Contract status
96% confidenceActive record
View supporting evidence
The supplied contract record for award "awd-1" is marked "active".
Duration and dates
99% confidenceNot supplied
View supporting evidence
No contract start date, end date, duration, extension, or renewal terms are provided.
COMMERCIAL VIEW
Commercial observations
Engagement scale
99% confidence£9,900 published award value
View supporting evidence
Award "awd-1" is valued at GBP 9,900.
Route to market
99% confidenceDirect, non-competitive award
View supporting evidence
The notice explicitly states that the contract was awarded to a single supplier without competition.
DATA QUALITY
Gaps and source limitations
Supplier identity limitation
99% confidenceThe named supplier is unverified
View supporting evidence
The completed identity workflow returned "checked_unmatched" and provides no verified legal company name or company number.
Contract timing and terms
99% confidenceInformation not supplied in the published notice
View supporting evidence
Start date, end date, duration, signature date, extension terms, and renewal terms are absent.
Award date
99% confidenceInformation not supplied separately from publication date
View supporting evidence
award_date is null; the notice publication timestamp is available.
SOURCE DATA LIMITATIONS
Information not supplied in the published notice
- The supplier identity check completed without a safe company match; the published supplier name is therefore unverified.
- No signature date, contract start date, end date, duration, extension terms, renewal terms, pricing breakdown, evaluation information, or bid count is supplied.
- No separate award date is supplied; only the award notice publication timestamp is available.
MARKET THEMES
Relevant award themes
Revenue ScotlandSETS 3Technology Assurance Frameworkbusiness justification reviewQuo Imus LimitedQi ConsultingCPV 72225000
COMMON QUESTIONS
About this award
Who was named as supplier?
The award names Quo Imus Limited (trading as Qi Consulting). The supplied identity-check data did not identify a safe verified company match.
What is the published award value?
The published award value is £9,900.
Was the award competitive?
No. The notice states that it was awarded to a single supplier without competition.
ProcuraAxis award analysis supplements, but does not replace, the official award notice, contract data or procurement documents. “Awarded” does not by itself prove that a contract has been signed.