AWARD OUTCOME
What happened
Kent & Medway Integrated Care Board published a Provider Selection Regime intention-to-award notice for essential General Medical Services at Church Lane Surgery, New Romney. The identified provider is INVICTA HEALTH COMMUNITY INTEREST COMPANY. The notice says the contract had not yet formally been awarded and began a standstill period.
Published outcomeIntention to award to INVICTA HEALTH COMMUNITY INTEREST COMPANY, subject to the stated PSR standstill process; no concluded contract should be inferred from this notice.
Market significanceThe notice concerns continuity of NHS primary medical services for Church Lane Surgery, with an illustrative five-year transparency value of £5,031,575 and an estimated annual recurrent baseline of about £1,006,315.
AWARDED SUPPLIERS AND LOTS
1 supplier record analysed
INVICTA HEALTH COMMUNITY INTEREST COMPANY
96% confidenceAward 099134-2026-1 · Lots 1 · £5,031,575 GBP · Identified most suitable provider; intended award subject to standstill
View supporting evidence
Award 099134-2026-1 identifies supplier GB-COH-06676854 for lot 1. Supplier verification gives Companies House number 06676854 and verified legal name INVICTA HEALTH COMMUNITY INTEREST COMPANY. The contract-level value is £5,031,575 but the notice describes it as an illustrative transparency calculation, not a guaranteed value.
LIFECYCLE
Award or contract stage
Published notice status
90% confidenceAward/contract notice published; source process status complete
View supporting evidence
Process display status is "awarded" and source status is "complete"; published 20 October 2026.
Award position
99% confidenceIntention to award, not a confirmed formal award
View supporting evidence
Procurement rationale states: "This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR."
Standstill
98% confidenceRepresentations due by midnight on 2 November 2026
View supporting evidence
Procurement rationale specifies that publication marks the start of standstill and gives this deadline.
Lot status
98% confidenceLot 1 is marked cancelled
View supporting evidence
Tender lot 1 has status "cancelled", despite the award and contract records being marked active.
Contract conclusion
65% confidenceUnclear from the supplied records
View supporting evidence
A contract record is marked active and includes dateSigned 20 October 2026, but the same notice explicitly says the contract had not yet formally been awarded.
VALUES
Published values explained
Estimated annual recurrent baseline
97% confidenceApproximately £1,006,315 per annum
View supporting evidence
Notice description states this estimated baseline is for transparency only, is not fixed or guaranteed, and actual payments depend on the GMS contract, national payment arrangements, and registered and weighted patient list.
Estimated total transparency value
96% confidence£5,031,575
View supporting evidence
Notice describes this as the annual baseline multiplied by an assumed five-year period for transparency; the contract record also states £5,031,575 GBP.
Value interpretation
99% confidenceNot a fixed or guaranteed contract value
View supporting evidence
The notice expressly states that neither the annual figure nor total value represents guaranteed income, contract value, or contract duration.
TIMELINE
Procurement timeline
Notice publication
99% confidence20 October 2026
View supporting evidence
Published_at is 2026-10-20T15:40:09+01:00.
Stated contract signature date
85% confidence20 October 2026
View supporting evidence
Contract record lists dateSigned as 2026-10-20T00:00:00+01:00; this conflicts with the notice text stating no formal award had yet occurred.
Standstill representation deadline
98% confidenceMidnight, 2 November 2026
View supporting evidence
Stated in the procurement-method rationale.
Planned service commencement
98% confidence1 December 2026
View supporting evidence
Notice and lot description state service commencement from this date.
SCOPE
What was awarded
Service
99% confidenceEssential primary medical services under a General Medical Services contract
View supporting evidence
Notice title, description and lot description.
CPV
99% confidence85121100 — General-practitioner services
View supporting evidence
Tender classification.
Service location
99% confidenceChurch Lane Surgery, Church Lane, New Romney, Kent, TN28 8ER
View supporting evidence
Notice and lot description.
Operational scope
98% confidenceClinical, operational, governance, workforce, digital, information-governance and patient-administration functions needed for safe, effective and accessible care
View supporting evidence
Lot description.
PROCEDURE
Procedure and competition
Regime and process
99% confidenceMost Suitable Provider Process under the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023
View supporting evidence
Notice description and procurement-method rationale.
Procurement method
98% confidenceLimited procedure; award without prior publication of a call for competition
View supporting evidence
Process procurement_method and procurement_method_details.
Competition
98% confidenceNo competitive process stated
View supporting evidence
Lot description says the ICB considered it could identify the most suitable provider without undertaking a competitive process.
Evaluation
95% confidenceQuality 100%; price 0%
View supporting evidence
Lot award criteria records quality "100" and price "0".
Selection considerations
97% confidenceContinuity, mobilisation readiness, workforce resilience, clinical governance, premises readiness and ability to assume delivery within the required timescale
View supporting evidence
Lot description lists these considerations; it does not publish scores or comparative assessment results.
CONTRACT TERMS
Published contract terms
Term
99% confidenceNo fixed contract term stated
View supporting evidence
Notice states the proposed GMS contract does not have a fixed contract term.
Options
98% confidenceNo options recorded
View supporting evidence
Lot field hasOptions is false.
Payments
98% confidenceDetermined under the GMS contract, applicable national payment arrangements, and the registered and weighted patient list
View supporting evidence
Notice description.
COMMERCIAL VIEW
Commercial observations
Commercial model
95% confidenceDemand-linked GMS payment model rather than a fixed-value commitment
View supporting evidence
The notice says actual payments depend on applicable arrangements and the registered and weighted patient list, while published figures are transparency estimates only.
Market route
96% confidenceDirect provider-selection route centred on service continuity and readiness
View supporting evidence
The ICB used the Most Suitable Provider Process without a competitive process and cited continuity and operational readiness considerations.
DATA QUALITY
Gaps and source limitations
Award and contract-status inconsistency
99% confidenceThe narrative says the contract had not yet formally been awarded, while the structured award and contract records are marked active and the contract record contains a signature date.
View supporting evidence
Procurement rationale versus awards.status, contracts.status and contracts.dateSigned.
Lot-status inconsistency
99% confidenceThe only lot is marked cancelled although it is linked to the active structured award.
View supporting evidence
Lot 1 status is cancelled; award 099134-2026-1 relates to lot 1 and is active.
Value limitation
99% confidencePublished figures are estimates for transparency, not fixed or guaranteed consideration.
View supporting evidence
Notice description.
Missing published details
98% confidenceInformation not supplied in the published notice: bid numbers, bidder identities, scoring, detailed evaluation outcome, individual lot value, contract end date, and extension arrangements.
View supporting evidence
No such fields or narrative details are supplied.
SOURCE DATA LIMITATIONS
Information not supplied in the published notice
- The source contains unresolved lifecycle contradictions: it describes an intention to award that had not formally been awarded, but separately marks an award and contract active and gives a contract signature date.
- Lot 1 is marked cancelled while linked to the active structured award; the supplied evidence does not resolve this.
- The £5,031,575 figure is a transparency estimate based on an assumed five-year period, not a guaranteed total, fixed term, or supplier-specific allocated payment.
- No contract end date is published, so no renewal timing estimate can be made.
- Information not supplied in the published notice includes competition metrics, bidder details, evaluation scores, detailed award rationale, individual lot value and extension terms.
MARKET THEMES
Relevant award themes
Church Lane SurgeryKent and Medway Integrated Care BoardINVICTA HEALTH COMMUNITY INTEREST COMPANYGeneral Medical ServicesProvider Selection RegimeNew Romney
COMMON QUESTIONS
About this award
Who is the identified provider for Church Lane Surgery?
The notice identifies INVICTA HEALTH COMMUNITY INTEREST COMPANY, Companies House number 06676854.
Has the Church Lane Surgery contract been formally awarded?
The notice says it had not yet formally been awarded and was subject to a standstill period, despite conflicting active structured award and contract fields.
What is the published value?
The notice gives an estimated annual recurrent baseline of about £1,006,315 and an illustrative five-year total of £5,031,575. It says these are not fixed or guaranteed values.
ProcuraAxis award analysis supplements, but does not replace, the official award notice, contract data or procurement documents. “Awarded” does not by itself prove that a contract has been signed.