AWARD OUTCOME
What happened
Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust published a PSR Direct Award C intention-to-award notice for dietetic services at Bowmere and Springview Hospitals. The proposed provider is Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. However, the notice text says the contract had not yet formally been awarded, while embedded award and contract records show active statuses and a signed-date field.
Published outcomeProposed direct award to Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust for lot 1, subject to the stated PSR standstill and representations process.
Market significanceThis is a small, continuity-based NHS dietetics procurement with an approximate lifetime value of £36,900. It indicates retention of the existing provider rather than an open-market competition.
AWARDED SUPPLIERS AND LOTS
1 supplier record analysed
Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
88% confidenceAward 096797-2026-1 · Lots 1 · £36,900 approximate lifetime value; allocation to the supplier is not safely determinable because the notice contains conflicting lifecycle data. GBP · Proposed provider / active embedded award record
View supporting evidence
Supplier is named on award 096797-2026-1. Lot narrative identifies it as the provider and gives an approximate lifetime value of £36,900; narrative also says the contract had not yet formally been awarded.
LIFECYCLE
Award or contract stage
Published notice
99% confidence14 October 2026
View supporting evidence
Process published_at and release history both state 2026-10-14.
Notice character
99% confidencePSR intention to award under Direct Award C
View supporting evidence
Lot and procurement rationale state that this is a PSR intention-to-award notice under Direct Award C.
Formal award status
99% confidenceUnresolved contradiction
View supporting evidence
Narrative says the contract had not yet formally been awarded; embedded awards and contracts records are marked active, and the contract record contains dateSigned 14 October 2026.
Lot status
99% confidenceCancelled
View supporting evidence
Embedded tender lot 1 status is "cancelled".
VALUES
Published values explained
Approximate lifetime value
95% confidence£36,900
View supporting evidence
Lot 1 narrative states "Approximate Lifetime Value of the Contract - £36,900"; embedded contract value is GBP 36,900.
Value basis
99% confidenceApproximate lifetime value
View supporting evidence
The lot narrative explicitly labels the figure as approximate lifetime value.
TIMELINE
Procurement timeline
Decision approvals
96% confidence27 August 2026 to 8 October 2026
View supporting evidence
Procurement rationale lists approvals on 27 August, 23 September, 24 September and 8 October 2026.
Representations deadline
99% confidence26 October 2026
View supporting evidence
Lot narrative and procurement rationale state that representations were to be made by 26 October 2026.
Intended service period
96% confidence1 April 2026 to 31 March 2027
View supporting evidence
Lot narrative states the service is intended to be provided during this period.
Embedded signed-date field
95% confidence14 October 2026
View supporting evidence
Embedded contract record contains dateSigned 2026-10-14T00:00:00+01:00.
SCOPE
What was awarded
Requirement
99% confidenceSpecialist dietetic services for patients at Bowmere and Springview Hospitals
View supporting evidence
Process title and description.
Primary classification
99% confidenceCPV 85112000 — Hospital support services
View supporting evidence
Tender classification.
Delivery geography
90% confidenceUnited Kingdom
View supporting evidence
Item delivery address region is UK.
PROCEDURE
Procedure and competition
Procedure
99% confidenceProvider Selection Regime Direct Award Process C
View supporting evidence
Process and lot descriptions explicitly identify PSR Direct Award C.
Competition
99% confidenceNo prior call for competition
View supporting evidence
Procurement method details state "Award procedure without prior publication of a call for competition".
Award rationale
97% confidenceContinuity with the existing provider; service arrangements stated to be substantially unchanged
View supporting evidence
Process description and lot narrative state the existing provider delivered satisfactorily and there had been no substantial change to the nature or cost of service.
Decision criteria
99% confidenceQuality and innovation 30%; value 20%; integration, collaboration and service sustainability 25%; access/inequalities/choice 15%; social value 10%
View supporting evidence
Procurement method rationale lists these criteria.
CONTRACT TERMS
Published contract terms
Options
99% confidenceNo options stated
View supporting evidence
Lot 1 hasOptions is false.
Intended duration
95% confidence12 months
View supporting evidence
The intended period runs from 1 April 2026 to 31 March 2027.
Renewal or extension terms
99% confidenceUnknown
View supporting evidence
Information not supplied in the published notice.
COMMERCIAL VIEW
Commercial observations
Commercial model
98% confidenceContinuity-based direct award rather than a competed procurement
View supporting evidence
The notice describes PSR Direct Award C, satisfactory existing-provider performance and substantially unchanged arrangements.
Published quality/value emphasis
97% confidenceQuality-related criteria total 80%; value is weighted 20%
View supporting evidence
Published criteria allocate 30% to quality and innovation, 25% to integration/collaboration/sustainability, 15% to access/inequalities/choice, 10% to social value, and 20% to value.
DATA QUALITY
Gaps and source limitations
Conflicting lifecycle evidence
99% confidenceThe notice text describes an intention to award and says no formal award had occurred, but embedded award and contract records are active and include a signed-date field.
View supporting evidence
Lot and procurement rationale versus embedded awards/contracts records.
Cancelled lot versus active award/contract records
99% confidenceLot 1 is marked cancelled, whereas its linked award and contract records are marked active.
View supporting evidence
Embedded tender lot status is cancelled; award and contract status are active.
Date sequence anomaly
98% confidenceThe intended service start date of 1 April 2026 precedes the 14 October 2026 publication date and embedded signed-date field.
View supporting evidence
Lot intended period and process/contract dates.
Supplier verification
99% confidenceSupplier is an NHS trust identified through GB-NHS identifier RJR; Companies House verification is not applicable.
View supporting evidence
Supplier record lists identifier scheme GB-NHS and supplier_identity_status not_applicable.
SOURCE DATA LIMITATIONS
Information not supplied in the published notice
- The source contains unresolved contradictory lifecycle information: an intention-to-award narrative, an active award record, an active contract record with a signed-date field, and a cancelled lot.
- The stated intended service period begins before publication and before the embedded signed-date field; the actual commencement date cannot be confirmed.
- No bid count, bidder list, evaluation scores, pricing breakdown, lot title, extension terms or renewal terms were supplied.
- The £36,900 figure is described as an approximate lifetime value; it should not be treated as a confirmed final contract value while lifecycle status remains contradictory.
MARKET THEMES
Relevant award themes
Bowmere dietetics serviceSpringview dietetics serviceCountess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation TrustCheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation TrustPSR Direct Award CNHS dietetics procurement
COMMON QUESTIONS
About this award
Who is the proposed provider?
Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust is named as the supplier on the linked award record and as the proposed provider in the notice.
What is the published contract value?
The notice gives an approximate lifetime value of £36,900.
Has the contract been formally awarded?
The source is contradictory: its narrative says it had not yet formally been awarded, while embedded records show active award and contract statuses and a signed-date field.
ProcuraAxis award analysis supplements, but does not replace, the official award notice, contract data or procurement documents. “Awarded” does not by itself prove that a contract has been signed.