Additional information from the published procurement release. Fields appear only when supplied by the source; check the original notice and tender documents before acting.
Score Classification
0 Unacceptable
No response at all or insufficient information provided in the response such that it is totally un-assessable and/or incomprehensible.
1 Poor
A poor response that either:
- Fails to address the majority of the question; or
- Addresses the majority/all of the question but with little or no relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in respect of the majority/ all applicable areas, and as a result, the Authority has little confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the Services in compliance with the Specification.
2 Satisfactory
A satisfactory response that either:
- Addresses all of the question with satisfactory (but not good) relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in some applicable areas which causes the evaluator concern; or
- Addresses the majority of the question with satisfactory (but not good) relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in some applicable areas which causes the evaluator concern; and as a result, the Authority has satisfactory confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification.
3 Good
A good response that either:
- Addresses all of the question with some good (but not excellent) relevant detail, but this does not cause concern; or
- Addresses the majority of the question with excellent relevant detail provided and the parts of the question not addressed do not cause the evaluator concern; or
- Addresses the majority of the question with good relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in a minority of applicable areas but neither failure causes the evaluator concern; and as a result, the Authority has good confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification.
4 Excellent
An excellent response that addresses all of the question, with clear and excellent relevant detail giving the Authority full confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification.
Numbers
Entry 1
Number
70
Weight
percentageExact
Criterion 2
Type
cost
Name
5 point scoring method 0-4 matrix
Description
Score Classification
0 Unacceptable
No response at all or insufficient information provided in the response such that it is totally un-assessable and/or incomprehensible.
1 Poor
A poor response that either:
- Fails to address the majority of the question; or
- Addresses the majority/all of the question but with little or no relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in respect of the majority/ all applicable areas, and as a result, the Authority has little confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the Services in compliance with the Specification.
2 Satisfactory
A satisfactory response that either:
- Addresses all of the question with satisfactory (but not good) relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in some applicable areas which causes the evaluator concern; or
- Addresses the majority of the question with satisfactory (but not good) relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in some applicable areas which causes the evaluator concern; and as a result, the Authority has satisfactory confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification.
3 Good
A good response that either:
- Addresses all of the question with some good (but not excellent) relevant detail, but this does not cause concern; or
- Addresses the majority of the question with excellent relevant detail provided and the parts of the question not addressed do not cause the evaluator concern; or
- Addresses the majority of the question with good relevant detail provided meaning that it lacks detail in a minority of applicable areas but neither failure causes the evaluator concern; and as a result, the Authority has good confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification.
4 Excellent
An excellent response that addresses all of the question, with clear and excellent relevant detail giving the Authority full confidence that the bidder has the relevant experience to deliver the services in compliance with the Specification.
Numbers
Entry 1
Number
30
Weight
percentageExact
Selection criteria
Criteria
Criterion 1
Type
economic
Description
Must be registered on the central digital platform. UK GDPR in place at time of contract.
• The Piped Medical Gas installations shall comply with, but not be limited to, the latest edition of the following standards:-
• Building Regulations 2010
• Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015
• Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002
• Electricity Act 1989
• Electricity at Work Regulations 1989
• Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 2008
• 7671, The IEE Wiring Regulations
• British Standards and BS Code of Practice
• Health & Safety at Work Act
• Health Technical Memoranda
• Health Building Notes
• Health Facilities Notes
• Model Engineering Specifications
• Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Hospital Engineering Requirements
• Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust Design Standards
• Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust Capital Projects Energy Policy
• Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust Environmental Sustainability Strategy
• It is essential that the Bidder is registered and holds the following accreditations:
• Registered with IHEEM national register
• ISO9001 accredited
• ISO 14001 accredited
• IET (Institute for Engineering Technology)
• Registered Electrical Authorising Engineer
• Chartered Engineers
• Professional Witnesses
Criterion 2
Type
technical
Description
• The applicant must be registered with IHEEM as an Authorised Engineer and be on the AE Directory.
• Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust is tendering for a provider for the provision of Authorising Engineer (AE) for Piped Medical Gases.
• The AE will act as an independent professional adviser to the Trust. The AE is appointed by the Trust in line with HTM 00 and HTM 02.
• The AE will act as assessor and make recommendations for the appointment of Authorised Persons (APs), monitor the performance of the service and provide an annual audit report to the designated Person (DP).
• The AE will need to work alongside this consultant in providing the services of the AE for all designs and installations of Piped Medical Gas Systems
The HTMs that are applicable to this requirement are:
• NHS estates guidance for medical gas pipeline systems (HTM 02-01)
Suitability
Sme
Yes
Vcse
Yes
Contract period
Starts
4 Jan 2027, 00:00
Ends
3 Jan 2032, 23:59
Max Extent Date
3 Jan 2034, 23:59
Renewal
Description
2 x 12 month
Options
Description
2x 12 month options to extend contract after 5 years
Buyer location · London · UKI44 · SE1 9RT · United Kingdom
Delivery location · UK · United Kingdom
Notice and amendment history
1 published notice version reviewed by ProcuraAxis.
1 VERSION
1
096602-2026Tender notice on Find a Tender ·
PROCURAAXIS ANALYSIS
ProcuraAxis Analysis
Our approved analysis of the opportunity appears below the official tender information.
ANALYSIS PREVIEW
Opportunity intelligence at a glance
Open tender for provision of a medical gas pipeline Authorising Engineer for Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust.
Who this may suit
Relevant to engineering consultancies or specialists able to provide medical gas pipeline authorising-engineer services. Explicit supplier eligibility, accreditation and quality requirements are not provided in the supplied notice data.
Key points identified
Service requirementProvision of medical gas pipeline Authorising Engineer servicesEvidence: Opportunity description: 'Provision of medical Gas pipeline authorising engineer'.
Supplier requirementsUnknownEvidence: No detailed supplier selection, technical, insurance or staffing requirements are supplied.
Supplier eligibility criteriaUnknownEvidence: No eligibility or exclusion criteria are supplied.
93% approved-analysis confidence5 supplier criteria identified3 risks or unknowns
ProcuraAxis structures information found in published procurement records, checks the result for consistency and publishes only approved analysis. Confidence describes the completeness and consistency of the available source information; it is not a guarantee of eligibility or contract award.
Open tender for provision of a medical gas pipeline Authorising Engineer for Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust.
Who this may suit
Relevant to engineering consultancies or specialists able to provide medical gas pipeline authorising-engineer services. Explicit supplier eligibility, accreditation and quality requirements are not provided in the supplied notice data.
Key deliverables
Provision of medical gas pipeline Authorising Engineer services
SUPPLIER REQUIREMENTS
5 criteria identified
Service requirement
99% confidence
Provision of medical gas pipeline Authorising Engineer services
View supporting evidence
Opportunity description: 'Provision of medical Gas pipeline authorising engineer'.
Supplier requirements
98% confidence
Unknown
View supporting evidence
No detailed supplier selection, technical, insurance or staffing requirements are supplied.
Supplier eligibility criteria
98% confidence
Unknown
View supporting evidence
No eligibility or exclusion criteria are supplied.
SME suitability
99% confidence
Unknown
View supporting evidence
suitable_for_sme is null.
VCSE suitability
99% confidence
Unknown
View supporting evidence
suitable_for_vcse is null.
COMMERCIAL AND DELIVERY
Contract intelligence
Commercial
Maximum stated value
96% confidence
GBP 140,000
View supporting evidence
Process value_max is 140000 GBP; Lot 1 value_amount is 140000 GBP.
Contract term
99% confidence
Unknown
View supporting evidence
contract_start_at and contract_end_at are null.
Pricing and payment terms
99% confidence
Unknown
View supporting evidence
No pricing or payment terms are supplied.
Delivery
Delivery location
95% confidence
United Kingdom
View supporting evidence
Delivery location region is UK and country is United Kingdom.
Buyer location
99% confidence
London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
View supporting evidence
Buyer location is London, UKI44, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Delivery timetable
99% confidence
Unknown
View supporting evidence
No contract start or end date is supplied.
PROCEDURE
How to respond
Opportunity status
99% confidence
Open
View supporting evidence
display_status is open; source_status is active.
Procedure
99% confidence
Open procedure
View supporting evidence
procurement_method is open and procurement_method_details is 'Open procedure'.
Submission deadline
99% confidence
9 November 2026, 17:00 UTC
View supporting evidence
submission_deadline is 2026-11-09T17:00:00Z, also recorded for Lot 1.
Notice publication date
99% confidence
13 October 2026
View supporting evidence
published_at is 2026-10-13T14:34:04+01:00.
RISKS AND UNKNOWNS
Points requiring attention
Limited tender detail
99% confidence
The supplied data contains only a short service description; scope, deliverables, evaluation criteria, contract terms, submission instructions and supplier requirements are unknown.
View supporting evidence
No supporting tender documents or detailed fields are supplied beyond the notice record.
Certification and compliance requirements
99% confidence
Unknown
View supporting evidence
No explicitly named certification, accreditation, medical-gas compliance standard or other qualification requirement is supplied.
Contract duration
99% confidence
Unknown
View supporting evidence
contract_start_at and contract_end_at are null.
ProcuraAxis analysis supplements, but does not replace, the original notice and tender documents. Always verify eligibility, deadlines and commercial terms with the issuing authority.
Continue in your ProcuraAxis workspaceFree account · Full approved analysis