AWARD OUTCOME
What happened
Leeds City Council published a contract and award update for day services supporting younger people living with dementia in Leeds. The active award names Community Links (Northern) Limited and Inspire North. The notice records a modification rationale under Regulation 72(1)(b), citing continuity needs and further consultation on the future service model.
Published outcomeActive award and contract record; the published update describes a proposed contract modification.
Market significanceThe update concerns continuity of a specialised dementia service and states that the cumulative value of two modifications is 46% of the original contract value.
AWARDED SUPPLIERS AND LOTS
2 supplier records analysed
Community Links (Northern) Limited
99% confidenceAward 094798-2026-DN252936-1 · Lots 1 · Not individually stated GBP · Active award supplier
View supporting evidence
The active award lists Community Links (Northern) Limited among its suppliers for related lot 1.
Inspire North
99% confidenceAward 094798-2026-DN252936-1 · Lots 1 · Not individually stated GBP · Active award supplier
View supporting evidence
The active award lists Inspire North among its suppliers for related lot 1.
LIFECYCLE
Award or contract stage
Published notice status
99% confidenceAward and contract update published 7 October 2026
View supporting evidence
Notice type is "awardUpdate, contractUpdate" and published_at is 2026-10-07T14:27:20+01:00.
Award status
99% confidenceActive
View supporting evidence
Award 094798-2026-DN252936-1 has status "active".
Contract status
99% confidenceActive
View supporting evidence
Contract 094798-2026-DN252936-1 has status "active".
Modification status
96% confidenceProposed modification described
View supporting evidence
The amendment rationale refers to "the proposed modification" and gives its proposed value as £627,844.
VALUES
Published values explained
Published contract value
99% confidence£3,431,543
View supporting evidence
The active contract record gives value.amount 3431543 GBP.
Original contract value cited in amendment rationale
98% confidence£2,350,033
View supporting evidence
The amendment rationale states: "The value of the original contract is £2,350,033".
July 2025 modification cited in amendment rationale
98% confidence£453,666
View supporting evidence
The amendment rationale refers to "the modification approved in July 2025 (£453,666)".
Proposed modification value
98% confidence£627,844
View supporting evidence
The amendment rationale states that the proposed modification is £627,844.
Cumulative modification value cited
98% confidence£1,081,510 (46% of original contract value)
View supporting evidence
The amendment rationale states that both modifications total £1,081,510 and represent 46% of the original contract value.
TIMELINE
Procurement timeline
Contract signed date
99% confidence29 August 2017
View supporting evidence
Contract dateSigned is 2017-08-29T00:00:00+01:00.
Published contract duration
99% confidence720 days
View supporting evidence
The contract period specifies durationInDays 720.
Notice publication date
99% confidence7 October 2026
View supporting evidence
published_at is 2026-10-07T14:27:20+01:00.
SCOPE
What was awarded
Service
99% confidenceDay services for younger people living with dementia
View supporting evidence
Tender title is "Day Services for Younger People Living With Dementia"; lot 1 describes "Day services for young people with dementia".
Primary classification
99% confidenceCPV 85000000 — Health and social work services
View supporting evidence
The tender and contract classification state CPV 85000000, "Health and social work services".
Lot structure
99% confidenceOne lot: Lot 1
View supporting evidence
The tender lists lot 1, and the award relates to lot 1.
Delivery area
98% confidenceLeeds (UKE42)
View supporting evidence
The tender item gives delivery location as Leeds and delivery region UKE42.
PROCEDURE
Procedure and competition
Procurement method
99% confidenceUnknown
View supporting evidence
Information not supplied in the published notice.
Competition information
99% confidenceUnknown
View supporting evidence
Information not supplied in the published notice.
Modification legal basis cited
99% confidenceRegulation 72(1)(b) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015
View supporting evidence
The amendment rationale explicitly cites Regulation 72(1)(b).
CONTRACT TERMS
Published contract terms
Contract duration recorded
99% confidence720 days
View supporting evidence
The contract period specifies durationInDays 720.
Extension or renewal terms
99% confidenceUnknown
View supporting evidence
Information not supplied in the published notice.
Modification rationale
96% confidenceContinuity of a specialised service, established relationships and the stated risk of disruption if the contractor changed; further consultation and co-production are planned for the future service model.
View supporting evidence
The amendment description cites the specialist cohort, relationships with users, carers and clinical partners, and planned consultation and co-production.
COMMERCIAL VIEW
Commercial observations
Shared supplier award
99% confidenceTwo suppliers are named on one active award for the single lot; the published record does not allocate roles or values between them.
View supporting evidence
Award 094798-2026-DN252936-1 lists both suppliers and related lot 1, while only a single contract value is published.
Value interpretation
98% confidenceThe published active contract value differs from the original value cited in the amendment rationale. The source does not explain the relationship between these figures.
View supporting evidence
Contract value is £3,431,543, while the amendment rationale calls £2,350,033 the original contract value.
Modification ceiling statement
98% confidenceThe notice states that the cumulative modification value is below the 50% threshold cited under Regulation 72(1)(b).
View supporting evidence
The amendment rationale states £1,081,510 is 46% of the original value and below the statutory 50% threshold.
DATA QUALITY
Gaps and source limitations
Award date
99% confidenceInformation not supplied in the published notice.
View supporting evidence
The award_date field is null.
Individual supplier values
99% confidenceInformation not supplied in the published notice.
View supporting evidence
The award names two suppliers but provides no supplier-level value allocation.
Lot value
99% confidenceInformation not supplied in the published notice.
View supporting evidence
Lot 1 has no value amount or currency.
Contract end date
99% confidenceInformation not supplied in the published notice.
View supporting evidence
No contract end date is provided.
Modification completion or approval date
98% confidenceInformation not supplied in the published notice.
View supporting evidence
The rationale refers to a proposed modification but gives no approval, signature or effective date for it.
SOURCE DATA LIMITATIONS
Information not supplied in the published notice
- No award date is published.
- No procurement method, bid count, evaluation information or pricing breakdown is published.
- No allocation of the shared award or contract value between the two named suppliers is published.
- No contract end date, extension terms or renewal terms are published.
- The notice does not state whether the proposed modification was approved, signed or effective.
MARKET THEMES
Relevant award themes
Leeds City Councilyounger-onset dementiadementia day servicesCommunity Links NorthernInspire Northcontract modification
COMMON QUESTIONS
About this award
Who is named on the award?
Community Links (Northern) Limited and Inspire North are named as suppliers on the active award.
What is the published contract value?
The active contract record gives a value of £3,431,543 GBP. This is not allocated between the two named suppliers.
Is a future procurement confirmed?
No. The notice says the Council intends consultation and co-production to review the future service model, but provides no procurement timetable.
ProcuraAxis award analysis supplements, but does not replace, the official award notice, contract data or procurement documents. “Awarded” does not by itself prove that a contract has been signed.