AWARD OUTCOME
What happened
South Holland District Council has signed a direct-award contract with YIMBY LIMITED for specialist planning consultancy services. The published contract record shows a £222,000 gross value, running from 9 October 2026 to 31 July 2027, with one possible 12-month renewal period.
Published outcomeYIMBY LIMITED is the verified supplier. The contract was signed and is recorded as active; a second active award/contract record for the same supplier and lot is explicitly described by the buyer as a system-required zero-value entry.
Market significanceThis is a direct award justified by the buyer on technical grounds and continuity of an existing consultant’s work. It covers planning-case determination, pre-application advice and associated planning support for the council and occasional work across its partnership.
AWARDED SUPPLIERS AND LOTS
2 supplier records analysed
YIMBY LIMITED
99% confidenceAward 1 · Lots 1 · 222000 GBP · active
View supporting evidence
Verified company number 13529303; award 1 names YIMBY LIMITED and contract 1 has a gross value of £222,000.
YIMBY LIMITED
99% confidenceAward 2 · Lots 1 · 0 GBP · active
View supporting evidence
Award 2 and contract 2 name YIMBY LIMITED. The procurement rationale says only one contract was awarded and that a second system-required contract entry has zero value.
LIFECYCLE
Award or contract stage
Transparency notice published
99% confidence17 July 2026
View supporting evidence
Release history records transparency notice 067500-2026 dated 2026-07-17.
Contract signed
99% confidence9 October 2026
View supporting evidence
Contracts 1 and 2 each state dateSigned 2026-10-09.
Contract start
99% confidence9 October 2026
View supporting evidence
Contracts 1 and 2 state startDate 2026-10-09.
Contract details notice published
99% confidence20 October 2026
View supporting evidence
Contract document 098751-2026 and release history state publication on 2026-10-20.
Current record status
98% confidenceActive
View supporting evidence
Awards 1 and 2 and contracts 1 and 2 are each marked active.
VALUES
Published values explained
Published contract value
99% confidence£222,000 gross
View supporting evidence
Contract 1 value.amountGross is 222000 GBP.
Additional system entry value
99% confidence£0 gross
View supporting evidence
Contract 2 value.amountGross is 0 GBP; the buyer explains this is a system-required second entry.
Lot-level value
99% confidenceNot published
View supporting evidence
Lot 1 has no value amount or currency in the supplied data.
TIMELINE
Procurement timeline
Initial term
99% confidence9 October 2026 to 31 July 2027
View supporting evidence
Contract 1 period gives startDate 2026-10-09 and endDate 2027-07-31.
Maximum possible end date
99% confidence31 July 2028
View supporting evidence
Contract 1 period.maxExtentDate is 2028-07-31.
Renewal option
99% confidenceOne 12-month period
View supporting evidence
Contract 1 hasRenewal is true and renewal description states one 12 month period.
SCOPE
What was awarded
Service category
99% confidenceSpecialist planning consultancy services
View supporting evidence
Process title and description describe specialist consultancy support for planning applications and advice.
Core activities
98% confidenceDetermination of planning applications, pre-application advice, planning reports, Planning Committee attendance and site visits
View supporting evidence
Process description lists these activities.
Workload
98% confidenceCaseload of 20–40 planning applications at a time
View supporting evidence
Process description states the post will hold a caseload of 20-40 applications.
Geographic delivery
93% confidenceUKF3 region, United Kingdom
View supporting evidence
Both award items list delivery address region UKF3.
Classification
99% confidenceTechnical planning services (CPV 71356400) and technical services (CPV 71356000)
View supporting evidence
Award items provide these CPV classifications.
PROCEDURE
Procedure and competition
Procedure
99% confidenceDirect award
View supporting evidence
Tender procurementMethod is direct and procurementMethodDetails is Direct award.
Legal basis cited
97% confidenceProcurement Act 2023 section 41; transparency notice references section 44 and Procurement Regulations 2024 regulation 26
View supporting evidence
Procurement method rationale states these provisions.
Stated direct-award rationale
98% confidenceAbsence of competition for technical reasons, with continuity of the existing consultant’s services cited by the buyer
View supporting evidence
Rationale cites Schedule 5 technical reasons and explains that the existing consultant's knowledge and expertise could not be replicated within a reasonable timeframe without adverse service effects.
Competition information
99% confidenceNo competitive bid count, bidder list or evaluation results published
View supporting evidence
No such information is supplied in the notice data; the procedure is a direct award.
CONTRACT TERMS
Published contract terms
Contract status
99% confidenceActive
View supporting evidence
Contract 1 is marked active.
Above-threshold flag
99% confidenceYes
View supporting evidence
Contract 1 aboveThreshold is true.
Performance metrics
98% confidenceNo agreed metrics published; buyer cites contract value below £5 million
View supporting evidence
Contract 1 noAgreedMetricsRationale states this rationale.
Office attendance
97% confidencePhysical attendance at the council office on a fortnightly basis
View supporting evidence
Process description specifies fortnightly physical attendance.
COMMERCIAL VIEW
Commercial observations
Continuity-led procurement
97% confidenceThe buyer’s stated rationale places material weight on retaining specialist knowledge of ongoing projects, governance, stakeholders and operational processes.
View supporting evidence
Direct-award rationale expressly cites continuity and accumulated consultant knowledge.
Value allocation
99% confidenceThe £222,000 gross value is attached to contract 1; the duplicate zero-value record should not be treated as an additional commercial award.
View supporting evidence
Contract values are £222,000 and £0, while the buyer states only one contract has been awarded.
DATA QUALITY
Gaps and source limitations
Duplicate award and contract record
99% confidenceTwo active awards/contracts are published for the same supplier and lot, but the buyer states only one contract was awarded and that the second entry is system-required with zero value.
View supporting evidence
Procurement rationale; awards 1–2; contracts 1–2.
Lot detail
99% confidenceLot 1 has no published title, description or standalone value.
View supporting evidence
Supplied lot record contains no title, description or value.
Award date
99% confidenceNot published as a discrete award date.
View supporting evidence
Both supplied award records have award_date null.
Information not supplied in the published notice
99% confidenceNo pricing breakdown, bid data, evaluation detail, supplier scoring or detailed performance measures are provided.
View supporting evidence
These fields are absent from the supplied notice data.
SOURCE DATA LIMITATIONS
Information not supplied in the published notice
- The buyer published two active award/contract records for the same supplier and lot. It states that only one contract was awarded and that the second, £0 record is a system-required entry.
- No discrete award date is supplied.
- Lot 1 has no published title, description or individual value.
- No competitive bid count, evaluation results, scoring, pricing breakdown or detailed performance measures are published.
- The possible renewal is an option, not evidence that an extension will be exercised.
MARKET THEMES
Relevant award themes
South Holland District CouncilYIMBY LIMITEDspecialist planning consultancydirect awardplanning services£222,000 contract
COMMON QUESTIONS
About this award
Who won the South Holland District Council specialist consultancy contract?
YIMBY LIMITED, verified against company number 13529303.
What is the published value of the contract?
The published gross value is £222,000 for contract 1. A separate £0 record is stated by the buyer to be a system-required entry, not a second awarded contract.
When does the contract run?
The published initial term is 9 October 2026 to 31 July 2027, with one possible 12-month renewal period.
Why was the contract directly awarded?
The buyer cites technical reasons and the need to maintain continuity of the existing consultant’s specialist knowledge and service delivery.
ProcuraAxis award analysis supplements, but does not replace, the official award notice, contract data or procurement documents. “Awarded” does not by itself prove that a contract has been signed.