AWARD OUTCOME
What happened
London Borough of Brent published a Provider Selection Regime notice for a child vision screening service for reception-aged children in Brent. The source contains an active award and an active contract record naming Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, with a contract value of £397,750 and a recorded signature date of 8 October 2026. However, the same notice says it is an intention to award and that the contract had not yet formally been awarded, while the related lot is marked cancelled.
Published outcomeMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust is named on award 096305-2026-1 for lot 1. Contract record 096305-2026-1 records £397,750 GBP and dateSigned 8 October 2026, but contradictory lifecycle evidence prevents a definitive conclusion that the award was concluded or the service became active.
Market significanceThe procurement concerns a proposed universal, orthoptic-led child vision screening programme for approximately 6,000 eligible reception children annually across Brent primary schools.
AWARDED SUPPLIERS AND LOTS
1 supplier record analysed
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
82% confidenceAward 096305-2026-1 · Lots 1 · Shared/unallocated contract value: £397,750 GBP · Named supplier on an active award and contract record; conclusion status is conflicted in the source
View supporting evidence
Award 096305-2026-1 names 'Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust' for lot 1. The associated contract record is active and valued at 397750 GBP. The notice rationale says the contract had not yet formally been awarded.
LIFECYCLE
Award or contract stage
Published award/contract notice
98% confidence12 October 2026
View supporting evidence
Release history records release 096305-2026 as an award, contract notice on 2026-10-12T17:30:33+01:00.
Award record status
93% confidenceActive
View supporting evidence
Award 096305-2026-1 has status active.
Contract record status
93% confidenceActive
View supporting evidence
Contract 096305-2026-1 has status active.
Source lifecycle conflict
99% confidenceThe notice rationale says this was an intention to award and that the contract had not yet formally been awarded; lot 1 is marked cancelled.
View supporting evidence
Procurement method rationale states 'This contract has not yet formally been awarded'; tender lot 1 status is cancelled.
VALUES
Published values explained
Recorded contract value
97% confidence£397,750 GBP
View supporting evidence
Contract 096305-2026-1 records value amount 397750, currency GBP. Lot narrative also states an approximate lifetime value of £397,750.
Value allocation
91% confidenceNot separately allocated beyond the single named award/lot relationship
View supporting evidence
The contract-level value is recorded against contract 096305-2026-1; no individual pricing or lot-value breakdown is supplied.
TIMELINE
Procurement timeline
Market engagement published
96% confidence13 July 2026
View supporting evidence
Description and release history reference market engagement notice 065663-2026 published on 13 July 2026.
Intention-to-follow process published
96% confidence20 August 2026
View supporting evidence
Description states Brent published an Intention to Follow the Most Suitable Provider process on 20/08/2026; release history includes planning and tender update releases on that date.
Expression of Interest deadline
95% confidence3 September 2026, 13:00
View supporting evidence
Description states the deadline for completed Expression of Interest responses was 1pm on Thursday 3 September 2026.
Recorded contract signature date
95% confidence8 October 2026
View supporting evidence
Contract 096305-2026-1 has dateSigned 2026-10-08T00:00:00+01:00.
Representations deadline
95% confidence22 October 2026
View supporting evidence
Procurement method rationale states that representations had to be made by 22/10/2026.
Estimated commencement date
86% confidence22 November 2026
View supporting evidence
Process description states the estimated contract commencement date is 22/11/2026.
SCOPE
What was awarded
Service
98% confidenceChild vision screening for reception-aged children (4–5 years) attending mainstream schools in the London Borough of Brent
View supporting evidence
Process description.
Delivery model
96% confidenceProposed universal, opt-out, orthoptic-led school-based screening, catch-up, referral and follow-up service
View supporting evidence
Lot 1 description.
Estimated annual eligible cohort
90% confidenceApproximately 6,000 reception children
View supporting evidence
Lot 1 description states that approximately six thousand reception children are eligible annually.
Classification
99% confidenceCPV 85100000 — Health services
View supporting evidence
Tender classification identifies CPV 85100000, Health services.
Delivery area
92% confidenceUKI72 (Brent delivery location)
View supporting evidence
Item 1 delivery address is region UKI72.
PROCEDURE
Procedure and competition
Procedure
98% confidenceProvider Selection Regime (PSR), Most Suitable Provider process
View supporting evidence
Title and procurement method rationale describe a PSR intention to award under the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023.
Published method label
98% confidenceLimited — award procedure without prior publication of a call for competition
View supporting evidence
Process procurement_method is limited and procurement_method_details gives this label.
Evaluation
79% confidenceMost suitable provider process; quality criterion shown as 100, with price also listed
View supporting evidence
Lot award criteria list 'Most suitable provider process with regard to the key criteria' as quality with description 100, and also list price.
Competition information
99% confidenceNumber of expressions of interest, bidders, scores and reasons for selection not supplied
View supporting evidence
No bid count, supplier scoring, evaluation outcome or award rationale is supplied in the source data.
CONTRACT TERMS
Published contract terms
Initial term
97% confidence3 years
View supporting evidence
Process description and lot description state an initial three-year period.
Extension
96% confidenceUp to 2 further years, described as annual extensions at the Council's discretion and subject to satisfactory financial and contractual performance
View supporting evidence
Process description and lot 1 description.
Indicative initial end date
86% confidence22 November 2029, assuming entry on 23 November 2026
View supporting evidence
Lot 1 description gives this assumed date sequence.
Indicative end date with all extensions
86% confidence22 November 2031, if optional extensions are used
View supporting evidence
Lot 1 description.
Service commencement
94% confidenceEstimated 22 November 2026; actual start is not confirmed
View supporting evidence
Description labels 22/11/2026 as the estimated commencement date; process-level contract start is null.
COMMERCIAL VIEW
Commercial observations
Service change
91% confidenceThe Council states that the service had ceased to be commissioned within the previous 0–19 healthy child programme and intended to re-establish it through a new provider.
View supporting evidence
Lot 1 description.
Performance focus
94% confidenceThe proposed model emphasises equitable access, safeguarding, referral pathways, quality assurance and performance monitoring.
View supporting evidence
Lot 1 description.
Commercial detail availability
99% confidenceNo pricing schedule, payment mechanism, performance metrics or individual service-volume commitment is supplied.
View supporting evidence
Information not supplied in the published notice data.
DATA QUALITY
Gaps and source limitations
Material lifecycle contradiction
100% confidenceThe source simultaneously contains active award and contract records, a recorded signature date, an intention-to-award statement saying no formal award had occurred, and a cancelled lot.
View supporting evidence
Award and contract status are active; contract dateSigned is 8 October 2026; rationale says 'This contract has not yet formally been awarded'; lot 1 status is cancelled.
Supplier identity limitation
99% confidenceThe supplier name is source-supplied and remains unverified in the supplied Companies House matching workflow.
View supporting evidence
Supplier identity status is checked_unmatched after a completed lookup, with no verified company name or number.
Unpublished award details
99% confidenceInformation not supplied in the published notice: award date, actual service start, bidder numbers, scoring, selection rationale, individual pricing and confirmed extension exercise.
View supporting evidence
Relevant source fields are absent or null; no such detail appears in the supplied notice data.
SOURCE DATA LIMITATIONS
Information not supplied in the published notice
- The source contains unresolved lifecycle contradictions: active award/contract records and a signature date conflict with an intention-to-award statement and a cancelled lot; no unsupported conclusion on final contract status is made.
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust is checked_unmatched in the supplied Companies House workflow; no verified legal company identity or company number is supplied.
- Information not supplied in the published notice includes award date, actual start date, bidder count, bidder identities, scoring, selection rationale, pricing breakdown, performance metrics and confirmation of any extension.
- The stated initial and maximum end dates are conditional assumptions in the lot narrative, not confirmed operational contract dates.
MARKET THEMES
Relevant award themes
London Borough of Brentchild vision screening serviceMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation TrustProvider Selection Regimeorthoptic screeninghealth servicesBrent procurement
COMMON QUESTIONS
About this award
Who is named as supplier for Brent's child vision screening service?
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust is named on award 096305-2026-1 for lot 1. Its identity remains unverified in the supplied Companies House matching workflow.
What is the recorded value?
The associated contract record states £397,750 GBP. No separate price breakdown is provided.
Is the contract definitively concluded and active?
Not definitively from this source. It contains active award and contract records and a signature date, but also says it is an intention to award, says no formal award had occurred, and marks the lot cancelled.
ProcuraAxis award analysis supplements, but does not replace, the official award notice, contract data or procurement documents. “Awarded” does not by itself prove that a contract has been signed.