AWARD OUTCOME
What happened
Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead has published a pending award to HBV CITYHEART LIMITED for the Imperial Road Development Project. The proposed arrangement concerns redevelopment of a council-owned site for independent-living housing for people with learning disabilities, alongside housing-management services. The notice does not evidence a signed or active contract.
Published outcomePending award to HBV CITYHEART LIMITED, subject to the stated standstill and future-signature milestones.
Market significanceThis is a long-term development and housing-management opportunity structured around a proposed 250-year low- or nil-consideration lease. The advertised £150 million value is an estimated maximum based on potential lease-term gross income, not a stated buyer funding envelope.
AWARDED SUPPLIERS AND LOTS
1 supplier record analysed
HBV CITYHEART LIMITED
98% confidenceAward 1 · Lots 1 · £150,000,000 advertised anticipated maximum value; not allocated as an individual supplier payment GBP · Pending award
View supporting evidence
Award 1 names HBV CITYHEART LIMITED as supplier and has status pending. The award value is £150,000,000, while the notice explains this is an advertised anticipated maximum based on estimated gross income over a 250-year lease.
LIFECYCLE
Award or contract stage
Published notice type
99% confidenceContract award notice on Find a Tender
View supporting evidence
Award document 096727-2026 is described as a Contract award notice on Find a Tender and was published on 13 October 2026.
Award status
99% confidencePending
View supporting evidence
Award 1 is explicitly marked "pending".
Standstill end
98% confidence22 October 2026, 23:59:59 (+01:00)
View supporting evidence
Award 1 states a standstillPeriod endDate of 2026-10-22T23:59:59+01:00.
Future signature milestone
98% confidenceScheduled for 8 November 2026
View supporting evidence
Award milestone type futureSignatureDate is scheduled for 2026-11-08T23:59:59Z.
Contract conclusion
99% confidenceNot evidenced
View supporting evidence
The award remains pending and the source records a future signature date rather than a concluded contract.
VALUES
Published values explained
Award value
99% confidence£150,000,000 net; £180,000,000 gross
View supporting evidence
Award 1 value records amount £150,000,000 and amountGross £180,000,000 in GBP.
Value basis
96% confidenceAdvertised anticipated maximum lease-term gross income estimate
View supporting evidence
The options text estimates possible gross income of £300,000 to £600,000 annually and states £600,000 multiplied by 250 equals the advertised anticipated maximum value of £150,000,000; income may be lower or higher.
Buyer funding envelope
97% confidenceNo financial envelope stated
View supporting evidence
The notice states that the Authority has no financial envelope set aside and that the bidder is required to fund the requirement.
TIMELINE
Procurement timeline
Award decision date
99% confidence13 October 2026
View supporting evidence
Award 1 date is 2026-10-13.
Assessment summaries sent
98% confidence13 October 2026
View supporting evidence
Award 1 assessmentSummariesDateSent is 2026-10-13.
Stated contract period
98% confidence9 November 2026 to 8 November 2030
View supporting evidence
Award 1 contractPeriod specifies startDate 2026-11-09 and endDate 2030-11-08.
SCOPE
What was awarded
Development requirement
96% confidenceRedevelop the Imperial Road site by demolishing existing day-centre buildings and delivering two new schemes.
View supporting evidence
The description states the partner is to demolish existing buildings and build two new schemes.
Intended accommodation
96% confidenceAnticipated 22 places for people with learning disabilities with medium to high needs.
View supporting evidence
The description anticipates two schemes of 11 people each, totalling 22 units.
Indicative configuration
95% confidenceEach building proposed as a six-unit shared home with staff and communal facilities plus five self-contained flats.
View supporting evidence
This configuration is described as the current proposed arrangement; alternative proposals are expressly open for consideration.
Operational services
97% confidenceHousing management, including repairs and maintenance, and partnership working with an identified care provider.
View supporting evidence
The description requires the partner or subcontractor to provide housing management and work with the identified care provider.
Classification
99% confidenceConstruction work (CPV 45000000)
View supporting evidence
Award item 1 lists CPV 45000000, Construction work.
PROCEDURE
Procedure and competition
Procedure
99% confidenceOpen procedure
View supporting evidence
Tender procurementMethod is open and procurementMethodDetails is Open procedure.
Legal basis
99% confidenceProcurement Act 2023
View supporting evidence
Tender legal basis is recorded as 2023/54 under the UKPGA scheme.
Competition data
99% confidenceNumber of tenders and evaluation results not supplied
View supporting evidence
No bid count, scores, ranking, or award rationale is included in the supplied notice data.
CONTRACT TERMS
Published contract terms
Proposed lease arrangement
96% confidence250-year lease at low to nil consideration
View supporting evidence
The procurement description states RBWM intends to lease the site at low to nil consideration for 250 years.
Options and contingent funding
94% confidenceOptions are recorded; possible Authority funding support is reserved but not stated as routine.
View supporting evidence
Award 1 hasOptions is true. The options text reserves rights to address housing-benefit disparities and use available external or internal funding, while stating routine use is not anticipated.
Operating-risk position
93% confidenceAuthority states it considered there was no meaningful real operating risk because of its commitment regarding void rooms.
View supporting evidence
The options text says the Authority determined the requirement did not satisfy the relevant section 8 criterion and cites its commitment to fulfil financially void rooms.
COMMERCIAL VIEW
Commercial observations
Commercial model
95% confidenceDeveloper-led and bidder-funded delivery model
View supporting evidence
The notice says the bidder is required to fund the requirement and describes potential income as contingent on the delivery model and funding arrangement.
Demand and revenue sensitivity
96% confidencePotential income is explicitly uncertain and may be lower or higher than the advertised estimate.
View supporting evidence
The options text states income may be less or more over the lease term depending on the preferred bidder's delivery model and funding arrangement.
DATA QUALITY
Gaps and source limitations
Pending rather than concluded award
99% confidenceThe notice supports a pending award only; it does not demonstrate a signed, started, or active contract.
View supporting evidence
Award status is pending and a future signature milestone is scheduled for 8 November 2026.
Term inconsistency requiring caution
98% confidenceThe description refers to a proposed 250-year lease, while the award record gives a contract period from November 2026 to November 2030. The supplied data does not explain how these periods relate.
View supporting evidence
Procurement description and award contractPeriod provide the differing terms.
Information not supplied in the published notice
99% confidenceLot title, individual lot value, tender count, evaluation details, pricing breakdown, and detailed extension or renewal terms are not supplied.
View supporting evidence
Lot 1 has no title or value, and no such competition or pricing fields are present in the supplied data.
Date-record anomaly
98% confidenceThe process-level published_at field is 3 November 2025, whereas the supplied award notice document was published on 13 October 2026.
View supporting evidence
Process metadata and document datePublished contain these different dates.
SOURCE DATA LIMITATIONS
Information not supplied in the published notice
- The award is pending; a concluded or signed contract is not evidenced.
- The supplied records contain unexplained differences between the proposed 250-year lease term and the stated 2026-2030 contract period.
- The published notice does not provide tender counts, scoring, award rationale, lot-level value allocation, or detailed pricing.
- The £150 million figure is a contingent anticipated maximum income estimate and should not be read as confirmed buyer expenditure.
MARKET THEMES
Relevant award themes
RBWM Imperial Road Development ProjectHBV CITYHEART LIMITEDRoyal Borough of Windsor & Maidenheadlearning disability housingImperial Road redevelopmentFind a Tender award
COMMON QUESTIONS
About this award
Who is named in the pending award?
HBV CITYHEART LIMITED, verified by company number 12256823.
Is the contract signed?
No. The supplied award record is pending and includes a future signature milestone.
What does the £150 million value represent?
The notice describes it as an advertised anticipated maximum based on possible gross income across a proposed 250-year lease term.
ProcuraAxis award analysis supplements, but does not replace, the official award notice, contract data or procurement documents. “Awarded” does not by itself prove that a contract has been signed.