✓Tender information last checkedLast checked 19 Oct 2026, 10:06.
Opportunity overview
NHS England – Midlands (West) (referred to as the Commissioner) awarded a contract to InHealth Intelligence for the provision of Diabetic Eye Screening Programme (DESP) across Shropshire and Staffordshire following a Competitive Process.
Awarded to
Amounts belong to published awards or contracts. Where several suppliers share one value, it is labelled as shared and is not a supplier-specific allocation.
Additional information from the published procurement release. Fields appear only when supplied by the source; check the original notice and tender documents before acting.
Scope, procedure and submissions
Id
AG25014
Main Procurement Category
services
Legal basis
Id
32014L0024
Scheme
CELEX
Classification
Scheme
CPV
Id
85100000
Description
Health services
Amendments
Entry 1
Id
1
Unstructured Changes
Entry 1
Old Value
Text
This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Procurement Act 2023 do not apply to this award.The standstill period begins on the day after the publication of this notice. Representations by providers must be made to the relevant authority by 12 (midnight) on Friday 20th March 2026. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award a contract under the competitive process of the PSR.Written representations need to be sent via the Atamis e-tendering portal, Project Reference: C384799 - Diabetic Eye Screening Programme (DESP) across Shropshire and Staffordshire.The award decision makers are Screening Governance Group and Regional Commissioning Group .The evaluation panel consisted of NHS England – Midlands (West) personnel: -Senior Finance OfficerSenior Finance Manager Public Health Contracts ManagerSenior Information Governance ManagerConsultant Public HealthSenior Commissioning ManagerScreening coordinatorScreening Contract Manager Screening ManagerAssistant Contract ManagerAssistant Screening CoordinatorContracts ManagerTwo potential conflicts of interest were flagged as part of this process. The two conflicts of interest were reviewed by the Project Lead who agreed that the two members who identified potential conflicts of interest were to remain as part of the evaluation panel.The perceived conflicts of interest were mitigated against as no prior information or contractual information regarding the Provider was taken into consideration when evaluating. The panel members who did identify perceived conflicts of interest were never the sole voice on any scores as each question had more than one panel member and was the questions were discussed in depth as part of a robust moderation process.The Basic Selection Criteria was scored on a Pass/Fail or For Information basis. The Key Criteria was scored on a weighted questions basis as follows:1. Quality and Innovation 25.00%2. Value 20.00%3. Integration, Collaboration & Service Sustainability 30.00%4. Improving access, reducing health inequalities and facilitating Choice 15.00%5. Social Value 10.00%The weightings for the 5 key criteria were determined by the procurement panel to give appropriate relative importance to each of the sections equally in line with the commissioning expectations for the service. These were assessed on a scored basis (0-5), with the exception of the Value Key Criteria which was scored, as per the evaluation criteria set out within the procurement documentation.The awarded Provider has been selected as they have met all requirements of the Basic Selection Criteria and scored the highest overall out of 100% against the published Key Criteria (listed above).
New Value
Text
This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) confirmation of contract award notice. This contract has been awarded under the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Procurement Act 2023 do not apply to this award.This contract has now been formally awarded using the competitive process.The contract was signed 6th October 2026. The contract commenced on 1st January 2027 and is scheduled to end 31st December 2035. The total contract value for the full term of the contract is £28,758,774.50Two conflicts of interest were flagged as part of this process. The two conflicts of interest were reviewed by the Project Lead who agreed that the two members who identified potential conflicts of interest were to remain as part of the evaluation panel.The perceived conflicts of interest were mitigated against as no prior information or contractual information regarding the Provider was taken into consideration when evaluating. The panel members who did identify perceived conflicts of interest were never the sole voice on any scores as each question had more than one panel member and was the questions were discussed in depth as part of a robust moderation process.No representations were received during the standstill period.
Buyer location · London · UKI · SE1 8UG · United Kingdom
Notice and amendment history
2 published notice versions reviewed by ProcuraAxis.
2 VERSIONS
1
020861-2026award, contract ·
2
098264-2026tenderUpdate ·
PROCURAAXIS ANALYSIS
ProcuraAxis Analysis
Our approved analysis of the opportunity appears below the official tender information.
ANALYSIS PREVIEW
Opportunity intelligence at a glance
NHS England Midlands (West) states that it awarded a contract to InHealth Intelligence to provide the Diabetic Eye Screening Programme across Shropshire and Staffordshire, following a Competitive Process. However, the supplied record is labelled as an open tender update with an Open procedure, so the current procurement status is conflicting.
Who this may suit
Relevant to providers of diabetic eye-screening services. The record may describe an award rather than an open bidding opportunity; verify the source notice before taking action.
Key points identified
Service scopeProvision of a Diabetic Eye Screening Programme (DESP)Evidence: "awarded a contract to InHealth Intelligence for the provision of Diabetic Eye Screening Programme (DESP)"
Geographic coverageShropshire and StaffordshireEvidence: "across Shropshire and Staffordshire"
Supplier requirementsUnknownEvidence: No technical, quality, staffing, accreditation or submission requirements are supplied.
84% approved-analysis confidence5 supplier criteria identified4 risks or unknowns
ProcuraAxis structures information found in published procurement records, checks the result for consistency and publishes only approved analysis. Confidence describes the completeness and consistency of the available source information; it is not a guarantee of eligibility or contract award.
NHS England Midlands (West) states that it awarded a contract to InHealth Intelligence to provide the Diabetic Eye Screening Programme across Shropshire and Staffordshire, following a Competitive Process. However, the supplied record is labelled as an open tender update with an Open procedure, so the current procurement status is conflicting.
Who this may suit
Relevant to providers of diabetic eye-screening services. The record may describe an award rather than an open bidding opportunity; verify the source notice before taking action.
Key deliverables
Provision of a Diabetic Eye Screening Programme (DESP) across Shropshire and Staffordshire.
SUPPLIER REQUIREMENTS
5 criteria identified
Service scope
98% confidence
Provision of a Diabetic Eye Screening Programme (DESP)
View supporting evidence
"awarded a contract to InHealth Intelligence for the provision of Diabetic Eye Screening Programme (DESP)"
Geographic coverage
98% confidence
Shropshire and Staffordshire
View supporting evidence
"across Shropshire and Staffordshire"
Supplier requirements
99% confidence
Unknown
View supporting evidence
No technical, quality, staffing, accreditation or submission requirements are supplied.
SME suitability
99% confidence
Unknown
View supporting evidence
"suitable_for_sme" is null.
VCSE suitability
99% confidence
Unknown
View supporting evidence
"suitable_for_vcse" is null.
COMMERCIAL AND DELIVERY
Contract intelligence
Commercial
Contract value
99% confidence
Unknown
View supporting evidence
value_min, value_max and currency are null.
Named awarded provider
98% confidence
InHealth Intelligence
View supporting evidence
"awarded a contract to InHealth Intelligence"
Delivery
Delivery area
98% confidence
Shropshire and Staffordshire
View supporting evidence
"across Shropshire and Staffordshire"
Contract dates
99% confidence
Unknown
View supporting evidence
contract_start_at and contract_end_at are null.
PROCEDURE
How to respond
Supplied display status
95% confidence
Open
View supporting evidence
display_status is "open" and stage is "tender".
Supplied procedure
98% confidence
Open procedure
View supporting evidence
procurement_method is "open"; procurement_method_details is "Open procedure".
Narrative process description
90% confidence
Competitive Process
View supporting evidence
"following a Competitive Process"
Notice type
98% confidence
tenderUpdate
View supporting evidence
notice_type is "tenderUpdate".
Submission deadline
99% confidence
Unknown
View supporting evidence
submission_deadline is null.
RISKS AND UNKNOWNS
Points requiring attention
Status and award contradiction
99% confidence
The narrative says a contract was awarded to InHealth Intelligence, while the supplied record is staged as a tender, displayed as open, and typed as a tender update. The supplied evidence does not establish whether competition remains open.
View supporting evidence
"awarded a contract to InHealth Intelligence"; stage "tender"; display_status "open"; notice_type "tenderUpdate".
Procedure terminology inconsistency
96% confidence
The narrative refers to a "Competitive Process", whereas structured metadata says "Open procedure". Neither interpretation should be preferred without checking the source notice.
View supporting evidence
"following a Competitive Process"; procurement_method_details "Open procedure".
Commercial and timetable information absent
99% confidence
No contract value, submission deadline, or contract start/end dates are supplied.
View supporting evidence
Relevant supplied fields are null.
Location ambiguity
98% confidence
The structured location is labelled "Buyer location" and identifies London; it should not be treated as the service delivery location.
ProcuraAxis analysis supplements, but does not replace, the original notice and tender documents. Always verify eligibility, deadlines and commercial terms with the issuing authority.
Continue in your ProcuraAxis workspaceFree account · Full approved analysis