Audit Qualification Literature Review

Opportunity overview

THIS IS A CONTRACT AWARD NOTICE The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) regulates auditors, accountants and actuaries and sets the UK's Corporate Governance and Stewardship Codes. As the Competent Authority for audit in the UK, we set auditing and ethical standards and monitor and enforce audit quality. The purpose of the FRC is to serve the public interest and support UK economic growth by upholding high standards of corporate governance, corporate reporting, audit and actuarial work. This procurement was to engage an external provider to conduct an audit‑qualification literature review. Purpose This project will gather, synthesise and analyse existing evidence, including academic research, on the pre-qualification education, training, and assessment of UK statutory auditors. Specifically it will: • Summarise current thinking on changes in the role of financial auditors, specifically with respect to their education and training needs. • Examine the evidence on how technology and AI are influencing auditor knowledge and skill requirements - and how this might feed through to qualification requirements. • Identify challenges these changes pose for the pre-qualification education and training of auditors and the assessment mechanisms used to admit them to the profession. • Identify specific topics / proxies / sources which will help us monitor the audit qualification landscape and the impact of any changes. • Explore how other jurisdictions and professions (e.g. the legal profession) are responding or changing their own qualification pathways. • Present a consolidated view of academic, professional, and industry insights. Scope The review will cover the UK plus comparable jurisdictions (for example EEA countries, US, Australia, Canada, Singapore). Sources: • Academic literature (peer-reviewed journals, conference papers). • Professional bodies (e.g. ICAEW, ACCA, IAASB, PCAOB, IIA). • Corporate and consultancy reports. • Regulatory documents and policy papers. • Comparative insights from law and other regulated professions. Suggested approach Literature Search • Databases: Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, SSRN. • Professional sources (e.g.) ICAEW, ACCA, IFAC, IAASB, PCAOB, etc. • Grey literature: company/consultancy analyses; government / regulator briefings; think tank publications. Inclusion Criteria • Recently published (to capture post-pandemic and tech-driven changes). • Focus on pre-qualification audit education, training, technology, and professional qualification reform. • Comparative studies or case examples from other professions. Thematic synthesis across four dimensions 1. Role evolution and skill gaps. 2. Professional training and educational responses in other jurisdictions. 3. Technology-driven competency requirements. 4. Cross-professional lessons. Workshop Part way through the research, a review workshop will be held at the FRC offices (either London or Birmingham) to discuss a full draft of the Review. This will involve the authors of the Review (i.e. the appointed contract team) and independent expert discussants as well as the FRC's internal policy team. The Review authors will subsequently revise/extend the draft Review to incorporate insights, and address comments, arising from the workshop.

Awarded to

Amounts belong to published awards or contracts. Where several suppliers share one value, it is labelled as shared and is not a supplier-specific allocation.

Classification

No classification was supplied.

Lots

• Lot 1Value not stated

Documents and notices

• Contract details notice on Find a TenderOpen source ↗