YPO - 001183 - Fire Safety Products & Associated Services

Framework Agreement

Method

withAndWithoutReopeningCompetition

Period Rationale

n/a

Type

open

Buyer Categories

https://www.ypo.co.uk/about/customers/permisible-users ↗

Description

The Pricing Card will be evaluated as follows and relates to Lots 1 and 2: All Tenderer's who meet the minimum score threshold of 25% out of 50% on the Quality/None-Cost element (half the available score) and 10% out of 20% on the Social Value and Sustainability element (half the available score) will be taken through to Price evaluation. Price Component 1: Pricing Approach - Quality Assessed (10%) Suppliers will be required to respond to a pricing-related question which will be assessed on a quality basis. This element evaluates the supplier's approach to pricing rather than the actual prices submitted. The pricing approach will ask suppliers to demonstrate the following: Transparency and clarity of pricing structure Management of pricing risk and cost volatility Demonstration of value for money over the life of the Framework Sustainability and robustness of the pricing model Responses will be scored in accordance with the scoring methodology and descriptions set out in the Invitation to Tender The pricing approach question forms part of the Cost evaluation only and does not assess technical capability, which is evaluated separately under Quality. Price Component 2: Pricing Card - Commercial Evaluation (20%) Suppliers must complete the Pricing Card provided. Price evaluation will be conducted using the CIPFA % difference model for each line. For each line, the submitted price is compared using a % price difference model and then scored against using the weighted criteria. The % price difference model allocates the lowest price submission the highest score and the highest price the lowest score. The price % difference is scored on the % difference between the lowest price and the price submitted. Each line will be given an equal weighting. For example, if 10 lines are evaluated and the section is worth 20% of the total cost criteria marks, each line will carry a weighting of 2%. Where a submitted price exceeds the lowest price submission by more than 100%, this will result in the Tenderer being awarded a 0 for price for that line. The total weighted score for each line will be added together to give the total score out of 20% Each element will be evaluated separately and the scores for both Pricing Card and Commercial Award question will be added together to combine a total score on Price. The total score achieved for Pricing Card (scored as 20% of the 30% available) will be added to a score of Commercial Award Question (scored as 10% of the total 30% available) to provide an overall supplier score out of 30%. For Lot 3 - Tenderer's awarded a place on both Lots 1 and 2 will automatically be awarded a place on Lot 3. Any pricing from Lot 1 and 2 will pull through automatically to Lot 3. Suppliers will be asked to apply any applicable discount for the combination of supply and service should they wish to include a discount for the combination of both active Fire Safety Equipment and included Servicing of the equipment. The total price including any discounts for each line will be used for evaluation purposes. Price Component 1: Pricing Approach - Quality Assessed (10%) Suppliers will be required to respond to a pricing-related question which will be assessed on a quality basis. This element evaluates the supplier's approach to pricing rather than the actual prices submitted. The pricing approach will ask suppliers to demonstrate the following: Transparency and clarity of pricing structure Management of pricing risk and cost volatility Demonstration of value for money over the life of the Framework Sustainability and robustness of the pricing model Responses will be scored in accordance with the scoring methodology and descriptions set out in this Invitation to Tender The pricing approach question forms part of the Cost evaluation only and does not assess technical capability, which is evaluated separately under Quality. Price Component 2: Pricing Card - Commercial Evaluation (20%) Suppliers must complete the pricing Card provided. Price evaluation will be conducted using the CIPFA % difference model for each line. For each line, the submitted price is compared using a % price difference model and then scored against using the weighted criteria. The % price difference model allocates the lowest price submission the highest score and the highest price the lowest score. The price % difference is scored on the % difference between the lowest price and the price submitted. Each line will be given an equal weighting. For example, if 10 lines are evaluated and the section is worth 20% of the total cost criteria marks, each line will carry a weighting of 2%. Where a submitted price exceeds the lowest price submission by more than 100%, this will result in the Tenderer being awarded a 0 for price for that line. The total weighted score for each line will be added together to give the total score out of 20% Each element will be evaluated separately and the scores for both Pricing Card and Commercial Award question will be added together to combine a total score on Price. The total score achieved for Pricing Card (scored as 20% of the 30% available) will be added to a score of Commercial Award Question (scored as 10% of the total 30% available) to provide an overall supplier score out of 30%. For Lot 4 - the Price score will be made up of Price Component 1 to form the overall Price weighting (30%). Price Component 1: Pricing Approach - Quality Assessed (30%) Suppliers will be required to respond to a pricing-related question which will be assessed on a quality basis. This element evaluates the supplier's approach to pricing rather than the actual prices submitted. The pricing approach will ask suppliers to demonstrate the following: Transparency and clarity of pricing structure Management of pricing risk and cost volatility Demonstration of value for money over the life of the Framework Sustainability and robustness of the pricing model Responses will be scored in accordance with the scoring methodology and descriptions set out in the Invitation to Tender The pricing approach question forms part of the Price evaluation only and does not assess technical capability, which is evaluated separately under Quality. Actual pricing for Lot 4 will be established at Customer call-off stage by means of Competitive Selection Process. The total scores will be calculated up to two (2) decimal places. Suppliers will not be ranked for this procurement.

Languages

Dates